2025 Carmage Walls Commentary Prize

1st place Editorials — under 35,000 circulation

Posted

Dave Coffey
Editorial Page Editor
The Berkshire Eagle
Pittsfield, Massachusetts

Top honors in the under 35,000 circulation category of the Editorials category of the Carmage Walls Commentary Prize competition were awarded to Dave Coffey, editorial page editor of The Berkshire Eagle in Pittsfield, Massachusetts.

First-place includes a curved glass plaque and a cash prize of $2,250.

As the federal government took an aggressive new posture on immigration in the first days of the Trump administration, an “enhanced targeted enforcement operation” swept 10 people off the streets of Berkshire County — including some residents who had legal residential status and no apparent indication of criminal record.

For the impacted neighborhoods, Coffey said these detainments felt more like disappearances. He said, “U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement has provided little public-facing information on the identities of the detained and what if any charges they were facing. In a series of editorials, we threw the spotlight on this localized chapter in an alarming national trend of disregard for due process, called out the government on its unacceptable lack of transparency and brought whatever information we could to the communities still gripped by fear after an immoral and lawless show of official force.”

Kevin Moran, executive editor of The Berkshire Eagle, said: “Dave Coffey’s editorials [on ICE raids in the Berkshires of Massachusetts] cut through the fog of federal secrecy to defend a fundamental American value: due process. When our neighbors were taken and no one in power would answer for it, The Berkshire Eagle's editorial page refused to look away. That’s courage — and that’s why this work matters. Dave's editorials show exactly why a fearless local newspaper matters: Because the minute we stop confronting unchecked power, this country stops being a democracy.”

Three editorials were submitted as part of this entry:

Among the comments made by contest judges:

  • This set of editorials was so thoughtful and well-researched and really explained to the public how ICE raids work.  The editorials talked about the cruelty of it.  The third editorial was such a great way to tie it all up because it showed how having this left in the dark is bad for us as Americans ... and dangerous.  
  • Judges liked the persistent way these editorials sought answers.  They called the editorials thought-provoking.  
  • They liked the fact that the opinions expressed were based on indepth research and that they pointed to the broader issue of government transparency.  One judge quoted the following sentence from the second editorial as being particularly captivating: “To operate without transparency is to wield great power with impunity.”